Pros and cons
Pros
- Gold standard method for measuring total energy expenditure in free-living subjects
- Does not interfere in participant’s daily activity/relatively low participant burden/’black box’ for participant
- Provides criterion validity for estimates of total energy expenditure and reported energy intake
Cons
- The method is expensive due to the price of 18O
- Mass spectrometry is also expensive
- Does not give a direct measure of energy expended in physical activity which is derived and there are assumptions to this calculation
- Does not give any indication of the intensity, frequency, duration or domain of physical activity