Pros and cons
Pros
- The method provides accurate nutrient intake data which is not subject to the errors inherent in data processing including the limitations of food composition data
- It is an objective measure of dietary assessment
Cons
- The method is expensive
- It imposes a high individual burden
- Individuals must be literate, numerate and highly motivated
- Unsuitable for large-scale studies
- It is unlikely to capture habitual diet unless adequate days are assessed, but even then there is a high chance of this method altering food intake to ease the burden
- Relies on the respondent providing a complete duplicate of consumption