Pros and cons
Pros
- Provides a prospective record of intake which is not reliant on memory
- There is flexibility to add additional foods or alternative portion sizes to the food checklist
- Suitable for group level comparisons
- Low respondent burden
Cons
- Requires literacy and numeracy skills
- Food list must be representative of the foods eaten by the population being studied
- Contextual information about eating not obtained
- Dependent on respondents completing the checklist prospectively rather than retrospectively